SgDotNet
Singapore Professional .NET User Group -For Cool Developers

Subversion qns

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,893
kitkai Posted: 10-04-2004 6:50 PM
Triplez,
When you make changes to ur source codes, what are you supposed to do?
Are you supposed to Update first, dan commit? Or are you supposed to commit straight away?

Y I ask is because
1. Things microlau modified, it is not reflected in the repository
2. When I delete a file, and I do a update, just in case microlau make changes, my deleted file comes back. It doesn't matter if i delete from explorer, or using tortoisesvn's context menu, it still comes back.

Pls advice! Smile

Best Regards, Kit Kai, MVP (SharePoint Portal Server)

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,290
Commit is to Set, Update is to Get. I believe you should Commit your changes up to the server, then Update down to you again.

The melody of logic will always play out the truth. ~ Narumi Ayumu, Spiral

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 1,221

Either way is fine. When you commit, it'll reflect a conflict. I'm not too sure about a deleted files though. It can be filed as a bug at subversion if it persists.

Regards, triplez ------------------------------ http://triplez.mine.nu/blogs
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,893
The delete issue always happen if i update first... I would understand that it should get the deleted file if i delete from explorer... But i dun understand y if i delete from tortoisesvn's context menu.

Thanks icelava, and triplez for ur input

Best Regards, Kit Kai, MVP (SharePoint Portal Server)

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 1,221
If you delete from the context menu, you'll have to commit first before the change is reflected in the server repository.
Regards, triplez ------------------------------ http://triplez.mine.nu/blogs
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS
Copyright SgDotNet 2004-2008
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems