- TrIpLeZoNe - - All Comments

re: Problem with SQL Server 2005 Report Server Services

lzyuacyjx — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:24:22 GMT

ytVjdb <a href="asrufygbpdcm.com/.../a>, [url=http://zgyugzlijtrp.com/]zgyugzlijtrp[/url], [link=http://gxehnunbdiem.com/]gxehnunbdiem[/link], http://bfmccmomgkxz.com/

re: Problem with SQL Server 2005 Report Server Services

pfipbf — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:45:51 GMT

VT61fC <a href="wvuhpcewrykd.com/.../a>, [url=http://fxnhukskvsmh.com/]fxnhukskvsmh[/url], [link=http://wrwbrgvgotvq.com/]wrwbrgvgotvq[/link], http://hmjzuqarnnmq.com/

re: C# Split By String

NeXuS — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:49:12 GMT

Here is a nice short version for splitting strings with strings

string[] result = myString.Split(new string[] { "<>" }, StringSplitOptions.None);

Is it JavaScript or DOM that is flawed?

stw — Sat, 27 Aug 2005 05:28:15 GMT

You are walking on thin Ajax grounds. Given latency and bandwith a Ajax interaction is priced at 1++++ sec. (Unless it is superfast intranet only). So this slows interaction down to a crawl. The challenge with client side script is the unholy allicance of so-so debugging support and the JavaScript/DOM combination. (I vote: Ruby in the client!!!)
A smarter way out would be to have standard JS function names on your page and some JavaScript Lib magic:
Let's say you have a field "OrderTotal" and you want to check (as a courtesy, not a fail save validation) if the total is within the limit for that client.
So you simply call a JS function ValidateOrderTotal(). The trick would be: the function lives in a Script Library, that is NOT static but computed with all your fancy server logic, so every call to that function might return different code. This way you have a server side computing without the need to resort to Ajax. You even can (using DOM) load such a library dynamically.
So Ajax is hip but not really the greatest thing since the invention of sliced bread.
:-) stw

re: TechEd 2005 - Thank you

triplez — Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:53:22 GMT

Yeap! I finally get to meet the cool superedge!

re: TechEd 2005 - Thank you

Superedge — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:30:00 GMT

very cool.
You guys did a fine job during the TechEd. Congratulations. And was very nice to meet you all there.

see ya
-Edge

re: AJAX - Bringing the client side logic to the server?

triplez — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:26:18 GMT

Oops! You caught me there. It's a typo. :) Thanks!

re: AJAX - Bringing the client side logic to the server?

icelava — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:32:39 GMT

"usually because it's easier to handle logic on the client-side"

I think that statement should have said "server-side" instead?

Client-side development is a pain because DOMs are not uniformly standardised across the various browsers. Moreover, Javascript (or in the rare case VBscript) that is necessary to drive the client-side programmability is usually in clear text open for all to see. This is a major security concern, where execution and manipulation of code is beyond that of a developer's control.

The only "real" application platform option for client-side would probably be Java, as I believe not many people want to hear about its-name-that-should-not-be-spoken ActiveX. oops, slip of tongue....

re: QueryString in JavaScript

rattler108 — Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:38:44 GMT

I have a question
I am using javascript to open a new window and display a picture on my asp.net application. What I am doing on my aspx page is that I am sending a querystring called inversion that is used to search for the folder where the pictures are stored. I got it to work on my code in the aspx and it takes the querystring to search for the folder and display the thumbnail pictures, but I have been unable to do so on javascript to display the full blown picture. Here is the code that I am using:

<script language="JavaScript">

function NewWindow(url, w, h)
{

// If you place Thumb.aspx in a different directory that your root image directory,
// you will need to add the image directory to url below, like:
// url = "/rootImageDirectory/" + url + ".jpg"

url = "Galeria/" + url + ".jpg"
if (w > screen.width || h > screen.width)
{
if (w > screen.width && h <= screen.height)
{
var nw = screen.width - 70;
var nh = parseInt(h) + 36
}
if (h > screen.height && w <= screen.width)
{
var nh = screen.height - 70;
var nw = parseInt(w) + 36
}
if (w > screen.width && h > screen.height)
{
var nh = screen.height - 70;
var nw = screen.width - 70;
}

window.open(url,"_blank","width=" + nw + ",height=" + nh + ",left=0,top=0,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes");

}
else
{
var nh = parseInt(h) + 25;
var nw = parseInt(w) + 25;
window.open(url,"_blank","width=" + nw + ",height=" + nh + ",scrollbars=no,resizable=no");
}
}

</script>

what I need is for the function in javascript where it says url to also contain the name of the folder that I get using the querystring from the previous page. Could you please help me with this?

re: Power Collections For .NET

triplez — Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:19:04 GMT

Well, I hope you're satisfied with it. It's really good and I've tried it myself. If there's any other suggestions and bugs please feel free to email Peter.

re: Power Collections For .NET

chuawenching — Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:17:12 GMT

Interesting :)

Looks useful to me

re: C# Home: Contest 4 - Digits Recognition

triplez — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:16:23 GMT

The rectangle is the size of the image. LOL! :P It's the image border displayed to show you the border. In actual fact it's the size of the actual image.

re: C# Home: Contest 4 - Digits Recognition

hannes — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:21:24 GMT

It seems like a fun one.

I wonder whether all methods would attempt to find the rectangle around each digit? That would be my strategy, the rest should be easy.

re: Managed DirectX Slow? Not really.

triplez — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:32:34 GMT

Yes. It's located at www.vertigosoftware.com/Quake2.htm

re: Managed DirectX Slow? Not really.

hannes — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:09:28 GMT

Wasn't Quake 2 converted to managed C++ and directX? As far as I remember the loss in speed was minor, and that was with the first release.